Robert Landrum a écrit : > I'm working with a very large database. 300 tables and about 350 > sequences. Dumped, it's about 8GB of data. > > I've read several posts that seem to indicate that I need to let slony > sync my data between the master and the slave when I subscribe the > slave to the master. I would prefer to avoid this, as it'll take > quite a while for the sync to take place. After about 2 hours and 30 > minutes, I'm only about 5% complete. > > Is this just a limitation of slony? Or is there a workaround I've missed? > > Thanks, > > Rob
I'm afraid you're facing a real limitation of the actual versions. You have to let the first synchronisation begin with an empty slave database. Regards, -- Stéphane SCHILDKNECHT Président de PostgreSQLFr http://www.postgresqlfr.org _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
