On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 19:57 +0900, Stephane LAPIE wrote: > Oh, yes, I forgot mentioning, I already run a slon daemon on each server. > > As for the splitting, wouldn't having the processing done on two > servers, and with only two separate data sets (each server being master > for one data set) do the same?
Not sure, check from logs, which daemon does the actual data updating. I have not been running slony for quite a long time. I last used it at Skype a few years ago before we moved to our own implementation - Londiste/pgQ from SkyTools. The main reason was that our cluster got too big to manage with slony. > I noticed that for two data sets > originating from different servers, the set with virtually no > replication load compared to the other fared pretty well. ------------- Hannu _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
