On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:39:03PM -0800, Tory M Blue wrote: >> Slon 1.2.20 (For now as I migrate to 8.4 ) >> >> Just working out a new Slon setup, with a cascade configuration. >> >> ! master talking to 2 Slaves (if not more), that talk to 2-3 Qslaves. >> >> Is it wrong to have both Slaves talking, replicating to both QSlaves? > > When you say "replicating to", do you mean they're both actively > sending data to the other replicas? If so, then it won't work. Only > one can be the set origin for a given target at a time. But they can > both be forwarders, such that one could take over for the other. > > A >
Thanks Andrew Ahh interesting, yes I have it setup so that 2 and 3 both send (forward) data to 4 and 5.. the paths take, listeners are created but I had a feeling this may not be wise. Are you sure it doesn't work? I think I have it working, but if it's frowned upon or otherwise questionable, I'll change my path. Also to include more info. I have 3 sets. sets 1,2,3 are on the master and the 2 slaves (master replicating (actively sending data to both slaves). I could fail-over between these 3 nodes. set 1 is only replicated between the slaves (2 and 3) and the Qslaves ( 4 and 5). 2-4 3-4 2-5 3-5 Master and Slaves are forwarders. Qslaves are non forwarders Still wrong, even if I "Think" I have it working? Tory _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
