>Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance penalty?
That's kind of like saying "I want a car, but I don't want it to have an engine because I'm never going to use the gas pedal". If you don't have paths, it won't work. Slony needs paths to know were to send that data. Likewise, it needs to know if the data got to the slaves, hence the "chatter". Melvin Davidson --- On Wed, 5/5/10, John Moran <[email protected]> wrote: From: John Moran <[email protected]> Subject: [Slony1-general] I don't want failover; Can I skip chatter between slaves? To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 4:52 PM Hi, I'm not interested in failover; it doesn't make sense for my domain. I'd like to use Slony, without paying for the overhead of "chatter" between slaves; they don't need to SYNC between each other, because I'll never failover or switchover. Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance penalty? Thanks, John Moran _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
_______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
