On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Steve Singer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>
>  Makes sense now. But I guess the statement should have read like this:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>   * If you restore a backup of a Slony-I node (taken by pg_dump or any
>> other method), and drop the Slony-I
>>     namespace, this now cleanly removes /all/ Slony-I components,
>>     leaving the database, /including its schema,/ in a "pristine",
>>     consistent fashion, ready for whatever use may be desired.
>> </snip>
>>
>>
>>
> Documentation patch applied.
>

Thanks.

-- 
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.enterprisedb.com

singh.gurj...@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to