Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Vick Khera <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Vivek Gupta >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We have upgrade the Slony from 1.1.5 to 2.0.4rc2 and additionally the >>> platform has been migrated from 32-bit to 64-bit. To our strange ‘slon’ >>> process is taking ~250 MB of memory although its usage was in KBs earlier. >>> What could be the root cause either slony upgrade or the platform change? >> You'll find in general that the 64-bit OS will use much more RAM. >> Without knowing your OS and what the size was before it is hard to say >> for sure if this accounts for all of your increase. > > FYI, on 64 bit Centos 5.4 my slon daemons are using about 250k to 350k > resident (virt is about twice that). When they are first restarted > they sit at ~200k VIRT and 3k RSS.
Which version of slony 2.0.x or 1.2.x ? > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Steve Singer Afilias Canada Data Services Developer 416-673-1142 _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
