Raymond O'Donnell <[email protected]> writes: > On 05/01/2011 18:20, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Hi Ray, >> >> On 5 January 2011 18:04, Raymond O'Donnell<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, a quick question - can Slony-1 2.0.6 on Linux replicate to 2.0.4 >>> on Windows? >> >> No, it cannot. Slony versions must always be identical. There's >> probably no good reason to not use 2.0.4 everywhere to save yourself >> the trouble that comes with building Slony on windows (you need to use >> mingw). The bugs fixed in 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 are pretty unlikely to >> affect you. > > OK, fair enough - thanks Peter & Scott. I have 2.0.4 via Stackbuilder on > Windows, and I compiled 2.0.6 on Linux. I'll go back and grab 2.0.4 on > Linux and compile that instead.
I wouldn't think that a terribly wise wise. Version 2.0.5 fixed a LARGE number of problems from earlier versions, and you would lose them all by falling back to 2.0.4. I suggest you review the release notes: <http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=slony1-engine.git;a=blob;f=RELEASE;h=edd1bc425167ecfb51c8fbbe0fe24e6127fe27b4;hb=refs/heads/REL_2_0_STABLE> -- select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'afilias.info'; Christopher Browne "Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three" _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
