On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Melvin Davidson <[email protected]>wrote:
> >OK, same thing happened: disk usage on the Slony slave is now 96%, and > >this is while COPY of our large table (over 45 GB in size) is running. > > 106 GB is used on disk. > > >Any suggestions, please? > > Is WAL archiving enabled on the slave? If so, turn it off, restart > postgresql on the slave, then try replicating. > Thanks, Melvin. WAL archiving is disabled on both servers. (archive_mode = off). How much disk space should I expect Postgres (8.4.4) to use when receiving a 45 GB table via Slony? Best, Aleksey
_______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
