On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:00:56PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > Seeing as how nobody has really tried to think through the > implications of the change, it's not obvious that this is something we > ought to be doing in any already existing branch of Slony. I'd not be > too keen to "quickly shove it through" on 2.0, or even the > hopefully-forthcoming-in-not-too-long 2.1.
Let me say more emphatically that I think it would be a terrible idea to try to do this quickly. I seem to recall there was a reason we picked name rather than text in the distant past, but I have no clue any more what it was. Nevertheless, I'd be pretty reluctant to do this in a hurry. I hope the OP is doing this on a copy and not in production! A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
