On 12-12-04 11:50 PM, David Rees wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Steve Singer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For example, table 1 is in set 1 and table 2 is in set 2 and table 1 > has a foreign key that refers to table 2. > > Changes that occur on the origin node 1 which will be the same for set > 1/2 will obviously be fine, but is it possible for an event to be > committed out-of-order on node 2? > If you subscribe set 2 first, then set 1 and if both set 1 and your not using a different forwarder node, then I think you should be okay. > Thank you! > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
