On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Yep, they need to process in serial.  Not much way to "improve" on that.
> 
> An attempt was made to parallelize processing in the eRServer replication
> system, a predecessor to Slony, and we had to shut that off in practice.

Indeed, I have a dim memory of early discussion in Slony development
of trying to figure out how to force two sets to work in parallel, for
the case where you had tables that couldn't possibly have an
interdependency.  We concluded that it was a foot-bazooka and that
it'd be too much work to try to make this safe and fast.  So we gave
up.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to