Yeah, 17 cluster name if you prefer. I start one slon by one cluster. Samples :
slon -s 200 -t 60000 -g 50 -o 60000 -c 0 -d 1 -f /home/scripts/slon.conf repli_nat dbname=DB2 host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=slony password=123 slon -s 200 -t 60000 -g 50 -o 60000 -c 0 -d 1 -f /home/scripts/slon.conf repli_lc3 dbname=DB2 host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=slony password=123 slon -s 200 -t 60000 -g 50 -o 60000 -c 0 -d 1 -f /home/scripts/slon.conf repli_lc2 dbname=DB2 host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=slony password=123 -----Message d'origine----- De : Stéphane Schildknecht [mailto:stephane.schildkne...@postgres.fr] Envoyé : mardi 13 janvier 2015 15:22 À : Sebastien Marchand; 'Glyn Astill'; 'Vick Khera' Cc : 'slony' Objet : Re: [Slony1-general] too much work ! On 12/01/2015 11:38, Sebastien Marchand wrote: > Hi, > > 18 nodes, wan network. > 2 replications ( one with 1 set and other with 2 sets ( 2 directions ) > ) First replication from server 1 to n servers ( same schema, 37 > tables ) > 1 slon on server 1 and 1 slon by remote server Second replication : > set 1 : server A -> server 1 ( 90 replicated tables ) set 2 : server A > <- server 1 ( 1 replicated tables ) do the same with 17 other servers > ( one schema by server ) > 17 slons on server 1 and 1 slon by remote server database 5 gB. > > I don't know if that will help... Seems to me some information is missing. Distinction on databases, for instance. I guess, the 2 replications are not correlated.They just share same servers. In fact, the second replication is not 1 replication, it is 17 different replications. But, do they all end in the same database on server A ? -- Stéphane Schildknecht Contact régional PostgreSQL pour l'Europe francophone Loxodata - Conseil, expertise et formations _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list Slony1-general@lists.slony.info http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
