Everything is running on the same server.  One subscriber instance has been 
shut down.

test_db=# select * from _sloncluster.sl_status;
-[ RECORD 1 ]-------------+------------------------------
st_origin                 | 1
st_received               | 3
st_last_event             | 5000000264
st_last_event_ts          | 2016-02-29 09:58:24.455544-06
st_last_received          | 5000000175
st_last_received_ts       | 2016-02-29 09:43:47.461217-06
st_last_received_event_ts | 2016-02-29 09:43:38.254386-06
st_lag_num_events         | 89
st_lag_time               | 00:14:55.35601
-[ RECORD 2 ]-------------+------------------------------
st_origin                 | 1
st_received               | 2
st_last_event             | 5000000264
st_last_event_ts          | 2016-02-29 09:58:24.455544-06
st_last_received          | 5000000176
st_last_received_ts       | 2016-02-29 09:43:52.284371-06
st_last_received_event_ts | 2016-02-29 09:43:48.258894-06
st_lag_num_events         | 88
st_lag_time               | 00:14:45.351502

Thanks,
--Rob

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@yahoo.com<mailto:melvin6...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@yahoo.com<mailto:melvin6...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Friday, February 26, 2016 at 8:19 PM
To: Rob Brucks <rob.bru...@rackspace.com<mailto:rob.bru...@rackspace.com>>, 
"slony1-general@lists.slony.info<mailto:slony1-general@lists.slony.info>" 
<slony1-general@lists.slony.info<mailto:slony1-general@lists.slony.info>>
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Replication Lag?




________________________________
From: Rob Brucks <rob.bru...@rackspace.com<mailto:rob.bru...@rackspace.com>>
To: "slony1-general@lists.slony.info<mailto:slony1-general@lists.slony.info>" 
<slony1-general@lists.slony.info<mailto:slony1-general@lists.slony.info>>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:51 PM
Subject: [Slony1-general] Replication Lag?

I have a fairly simple test cluster, three PG instances running on different 
ports:  a master and two slave DBs both subscribed to the master.  Everything 
is running on the same server (it's a playground), so I have three PG instances 
(ports 5432, 5433, 5434; connecting via sockets in /tmp) and a slony daemon for 
each instance.

I'm running Postgres 9.3.9 and slony1 2.2.4 on Centos 6.7 x86_64.  Both 
postgres and slony were installed via yum using the PGDG repo.

I used the config below to initialize a very simple replication setup of only 
one table and one sequence.

My problem is that if I shut down just one slave postgres instance then 
sl_status on the master instance shows replication stalling on both slave DBs, 
instead of just one.

But, if I insert some test data into the master DB, I see the data show up on 
the remaining active slave.  So replication to the remaining slave DB is 
obviously working.

We use sl_status to monitor replication so we need it to accurately report lag 
if there's an issue.  The Slony 1.2 version we used before did not behave this 
way, it accurately reported which slave was not replicating.

Why does sl_status report lag on the active slave even though replication 
appears to be working fine?

Do I have a misconfiguration somewhere?

Thanks,
Rob


Here's my slony config:


      CLUSTER NAME = slony;
      NODE 1 ADMIN CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp port=5432 user=slony';
      NODE 2 ADMIN CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp port=5433 user=slony';
      NODE 3 ADMIN CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp port=5434 user=slony';

############ CLUSTERS

      INIT CLUSTER (ID = 1, COMMENT = 'Master');


############ NODES

      STORE NODE (ID = 2, COMMENT = 'Slave1', EVENT NODE = 1);
      STORE NODE (ID = 3, COMMENT = 'Slave2', EVENT NODE = 1);


############ PATHS

      STORE PATH (SERVER = 1, CLIENT = 2, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5432 user=slony');
      STORE PATH (SERVER = 1, CLIENT = 3, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5432 user=slony');
      STORE PATH (SERVER = 2, CLIENT = 1, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5433 user=slony');
      STORE PATH (SERVER = 2, CLIENT = 3, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5433 user=slony');
      STORE PATH (SERVER = 3, CLIENT = 1, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5434 user=slony');
      STORE PATH (SERVER = 3, CLIENT = 2, CONNINFO = 'dbname=test_db host=/tmp 
port=5434 user=slony');


############ SETS

      CREATE SET (ID = 1, ORIGIN = 1, COMMENT = 'TEST Set 1');

############ SEQUENCES

      SET ADD SEQUENCE (SET ID = 1, ORIGIN = 1, ID = 1, FULLY QUALIFIED NAME = 
'"public"."test_seq"');

############ TABLES

      SET ADD TABLE (SET ID = 1, ORIGIN = 1, ID = 2, FULLY QUALIFIED NAME = 
'"public"."test"');

############ SUBSCRIPTIONS

      SUBSCRIBE SET (ID = 1, PROVIDER = 1, RECEIVER = 2, FORWARD = YES);
      SUBSCRIBE SET (ID = 1, PROVIDER = 1, RECEIVER = 3, FORWARD = YES);

_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general@lists.slony.info<mailto:Slony1-general@lists.slony.info>
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


========================================================================================================
The config looks good.
On which server are you running the slon process?
What does your query for sl_status look like?

Melvin Davidson
    Cell 720-320-0155

I reserve the right to fantasize.  Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you. 
[http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/01.gif]
www.youtube.com/unusedhero
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com


_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general@lists.slony.info
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to