At 09:43 PM 10/02/2000 +1000, Ryan Mills wrote:
>At 05:41 PM 9/02/2000 +1100, Dave Fitch wrote:
>>YMMV & it all depends on which version of which product etc etc,
>>but in my experience, Sybase with raw partitions on Solaris
>>was the least reliable & most problematic database I've used,
>>closely followed by Sybase on VMS with normal filesystem.
>>Give me Oracle or Progress any day on any box,
>>for better reliability & integrity & speed.
>
>Hi Brian,
>
>What are your thoughts on InterBase and, now that Corel have merged with
>Borland/Inprise, the scheduled open source of InterBase release 6 ?
>
>RM
Ryan,
have not used Interbase, have seen a Delphi application which used it.
In Win world it can be deployed as single user on 1 pc, or multiuser
client/server on n/w of NT boxes.
I always liked Borland C/C++ compilers for win, and Corel seem to be onto
a good thing fixing up other companies discarded products (Wordperfect)
or discarded companies (Borland) 8-}
so Corel's management + commitment to linux will probly see Interbase on
linux,
I expect.
Brian
----------------------------------------------
Brian Martin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Future Software Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
