>On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 03:23:23PM +1000, Ken Yap wrote: >> The formats are "published". Only problem is there are lots of >> undocumented bits. > >Are they? Where is Office2000 word's file format documented? > >You could be right and that still wouldn't help if the published >definition of what the bits mean is vague enough. I assumed he was referring to the previous Word formats. But my point is it's no use ordering M$ to "publish" the formats, Office2000 or otherwise, if you can't check if they correspond to reality. I don't think even the M$ programmers know, their software must be a can of worms by now. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the text
