Sorry, forgot to mention that. It is Win2K professional running IBM HTTP
Server (Apache) and IBM WebSphere.
We have a win2k machine running for development purposes and it has not
crashed since Feb when the install was done. As a devel machine it has been
hit hard with TeamServer, MQ and DB2 installs and it has held up whereas the
previous NT machine used to blue screen quite often with the same s/w
configuration.
-- Aravind
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Del
> Sent: Monday, 1 May 2000 17:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] W2K Server [OT]
>
>
> Aravind Naidu wrote:
>
> > My impressions : Win2K is way more stable than NT, but still
> not in the same
> > league as my Linux and AIX boxes.
>
> Win2K professional is more stable than NT workstation.
>
> Win2K server is way less stable than NT server.
>
> Active Directory is highly unstable, and there are no repair
> tools for it. If your ADS dies then you rebuild it from
> scratch.
>
> ----+------------------------+--------------------------
> Del | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Christchurch, New Zealand
> ----+------------------------+--------------------------
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> unsubscribe in the text
>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
