One thing I noticed from looking at the pics of it was that there are no f
keys, but instead, a Fn button.. Changing terminals would then be a case of
alt + fn + 1 -6. ouchies. and imagine breaking out of X to a terminal for a
moment would be a case of ctrl + alt + fn + um.. umm.. how would you get
f12 on a 1 - 0 numbering system? would it be the +/= button??
And considering you can pick up el cheapo kb's for $25 I can't see myself
going out and spending $130 odd for less keys. Must be the scottish blood
in me :). And besides, I'd have to say I like having a numeric keypad..
helps for spreadsheets.
Each to their own really
Paul
At 12:49 AM 8/05/00 -0500, Matt wrote:
>>the win keys? may they die a nasty death.
>
>Ahh gee .. I dunno, if they're there anyway why not make em do somethin
>useful. Win + T for a GnomeTerm .. Win + X for XMMS .. Win + N for
>Netscape .. (Suggested serving suggestion only)
>
>They're not that bad .. are they ?
>
>
>I use WIN keys in Windows all the time for (R)un (E)xplorer (M)inimise etc
>
>They're cool :)
>
>
>Regards, Matt
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>--
>SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
>To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>unsubscribe in the text
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
