On Fri, 19 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Now the other interesting bit is that it does not need to do any local IO > >once up and running so I could probably get away with a flash disk or > >something. What about remote boot? > > If there is no I/O why does it need to be in a particular place? In fact > what is the point of it at all? I meant there was no I/O to the local hard drive. There is a lot of I/O to the parallel and serial ports and to a remote database. I am going to try and create a ram drive and put /tmp on it, then remount the drive as read only. From what I have been reading that should fix problems powering up after a power failure. There does not seam to be much doco on how to do this. The Linux Terminal Server Project does something like this so I am going to see what gleen from that. http://ltsp.org/ Rodos -- If the box says "Windows 95 or better", it should run on Linux, right? - anon -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the text
