; I would still use sed to do it, in particular from a shell script which may ; process a large number of files. ; ; Sed is much quicker to load than perl. the only problem being that sed doesn't cope with NULs, I'm talking about sed in general, not a particular version of GNU sed either, so don't bother. I'm with you though, I tend to use sed instead where I can. cheers, r. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Rachel Polanskis
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Stuart Cooper
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Erich Schulz
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Russell Davies