>redhat (and the others) conveniently ignore this little license issue No you are confusing Debian rules with Open Source. Debian adheres to strict filesystem layout rules, but Open Source is looser. Pine is Open Source, it just cannot be distributed with modified layout. As for economic benefit, I doubt if pine brings in the dollars. Conspiracy theories are cheap. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEASE no war please ... Alex Salmon
- Re: [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEASE no wa... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEASE n... Alex Salmon
- Re: [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEA... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEA... Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (PLEASE no wa... Terry Collins
- [SLUG] RH -> debian problems (from Mike La... Michael Lake
- [SLUG] Re: RH -> debian problems (PLEASE no wa... Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] Re: RH -> debian problems (PLEA... Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] Re: RH -> debian problems (... Herbert Xu
- Re: [SLUG] Re: RH -> debian proble... Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] Re: RH -> debian p... Herbert Xu
- [SLUG] Long: Kernel Compilation questions... Jonathan Wheelhouse