On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dave Fitch wrote:
> just bounce all attachments, whatever their type.
Strip is probably easier than bounce...
> maybe repeat offenders (within a certain timeframe) should be put
> on a list of people who can't post without manual approval?
Sounds like you are volunteering for this job? ;-) I would have thought
we had better things to do than police a list in this manner.
> Probably (a) a hassle for the list maintainers, and (b) pointless
> anyway with free web email accounts etc.
Quite true.
Something that bugs me every now and then is when people include the
previous message verbatim. We are all rather intelligent and all that
should be necessary is a mind jogger...
I also have been noticing that replies usually go to the list as a
whole. I have started doing it as well to try to reduce the number of
followups on the list. Really, what should happen is that these should
end up in the archives somehow without cluttering the list - does that
sound feasible?
tom.
Consultant
AUSSEC Phone: 61 4 1768 2202
339 Blaxland Rd., Ryde NSW 2112
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
