>From: Jim Hague [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Today's food for thought. You have obtained the entire source >for, say, W2k and >O2k. What do you do with it? Several hundred universities across the world have the source for W2K. At least a dozen in Australia do (QUT is one, not sure about in Sydney). WTF is the big deal about a couple more people having it? If I had the source, I'd probably go through it to see what good ideas there are in there to use in my own code - same thing I do with the Linux sources. Of course the S/N ratio is probably a big better in the Linux sources. John Wiltshire -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Steve Kowalik
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Clarke
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Conrad Parker
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of James Wilkinson
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Raoul Golan
- Re: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Stuart Cooper
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of John Wiltshire
- RE: [SLUG] MS goes Open Source - sort of Jamie Honan