Re: [SLUG] That somewhat theoretical problem.

[Peter Faulks]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:30:50 +1100, Ken Yap wrote:

>Not disputing that you need gotos in general but couldn't you just put
>return(ret) where you have goto currently at the expense of more code?

That would break the "one return point per function" rule...

Regards


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug