Sluggers, Just replaced a doze2000 box with a Samba server, so far ok 'cept for a couple of clitches.
A user claims that when they tried to open a file it refused saying that the file was open by someone else. User claims that no-one else would have had the file open. Closed the 'doze application (word) and re-tried, file opened fine. Is this just windoze mystery bug #1827636 or is there some way Samba could be implicated. Is there a file locking, ignore locking option in Samba, I don't recall seeing anything reading the documentation. When the Samba server is real busy (like doing a backup to tape and/or disk) using an application like word on the windoze box becomes terribly slow, with the keyboard cursor falling behind badly. What gives? The user isn't saving the file just moving around and typing and I thought that word would be holding all that data in memory. Does word/doze monitor the file server all the time, even if the user isn't reading or writing a file? Another user tried to copy an entire directory onto the server overwriting the existing directory contents. Received an open file error similar to the first person. Claims that no other user could have had the file open and that by copying a single directory at a time they were able to succeed. I must say I'm a bit confused about the open file thing, I thought that Unix didn't care, if two users opened the same file, then the last one to save was the winner. Does anyone have a cluestick to hit me with on this. File system is ext3 does that have any implications? TIA's Pete -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
