Ideally, I'd like to dump the Windows side of things alltogether - they are using a VERY minimal part of eDirectory for authentication and nothing more... $80k/.year is WAAAAAY too much for what they are doing.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Saenz Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 14:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] LDAP Gurus Hi Jon Depends on how you are going to do this. If you are going to have LDAP being the central database for authenticating w2k users you may need to install on w2k some unix tools supplied by microsoft. As far as I know there are no microsoft schema's available for openldap, I think there are some sites that talk about having openldap working with W2k do a search my memory is a little rusty on how we completed openldap and w2k at citistreet. > Any LDAP gurus here ? I'm looking at replacing an $80k/year Novell > eDirectory server on Win2K with LDAP on Linux and I want to see if there are > any major problems with this idea. > > Jon -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
