> <quote who="Jon Biddell"> > > > Which is a prime example of why the list should be changed to > > "subscribers only can post" - it would LESSEN the workload on our > > overworked list > > admins...:-) > > I disagree - not only is this a bad example of the point, but > changing the list to subscribers-only would not lessen the > administrative workload. > > It's a bad example because it's exactly the sort of activity > that would get around the subscriber-only restriction. If a > spammer subscribes, then there's nothing stopping them from posting.
I can see your point in one respect - but if they do subscribe, admins CAN kick them off and we don't get the mail. Yes I know this adds more work for the admins - you're right about that. Yeah its not all that much - but none is better than a little I guess. So I guess I disagree and agree! :) That's my 2c... Its not worth that much tho! AW. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
