Many thanks to the people who replied to my posting. It was prompted by my getting cdparanoia and cdrecord to produce a disc. (Never mind the sarcasm, it was a major miracle. My next project is to raise the dead.)
cdparanoia's propaganda says that it will "fix" small problems on a disk. All well and good. But having ripped an audio track, fixed or not, it has to be burned, ie., what with "translation" to .wav, software to send this file to the burner and the burning process itself, there is room for error(s). We do not live in the best of all possible worlds. Hence my enquiry. In my case, ripper and burner are not the same instrument, although even if they were, the argument remains unchanged. There are also these thoughts: even if errors *are* shown to exist, they may not amount to much, human hearing being what it is and if they *do* amount, I may not be able to do much about them. I will, however, post what results I get. Thanks again, Bill Bennett. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
