On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 22:15, Tony Green wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 22:07, Richard Heycock wrote: > > Why is that this list doesn't have the 'Reply-To:' header field set? It > > would make life much easier, it's a pain in the arse to reply to reply > > to a list without cc'ing the original sender. Is there a reason for > > this? am I missing something? > > > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
point taken. rgh > > And let's take it to slug-chat if that doesn't answer it. > > greeno -- "It is possible to make things of great complexity out of things that are very simple. There is no conservation of simplicity" -- Stephen Wolfram Richard Heycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tel : 0410 646 369 key fingerprint : 909D CBFA C669 AC2F A937 AFA4 661B 9D21 EAAB 4291 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
