At Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:20:09 , Voytek Eymont wrote: > I'd say, for higher quality, there is no subsitute for TIFF, as far as bit > mapped images go.
tiff is a "container" format, so what format you really have inside a .tiff is really what determines the image's characteristics. in pretty much all cases you can strip off the tiff header and use the contents in its "native" format (bmp, jpeg, g3, etc) - there is of course no different in image quality. even if you were converting between lossless image formats (pretty much anything except jpeg), you shouldn't see any difference (they're lossless after all). -- - Gus -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
