Note that its probably not a good idea to block ICMP source quench
packets.

Andrew McNaughton


On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Adam Hewitt wrote:

> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:30:21 +0800
> From: Adam Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: David Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SLUG List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Ping me please!
>
> seems to be working
>
> #ping 202.12.88.42
> PING 202.12.88.42 (202.12.88.42) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> --- 202.12.88.42 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 202.12.88.106
> PING 202.12.88.106 (202.12.88.106) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> --- 202.12.88.106 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 999ms
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 14:26, David Fisher wrote:
> > Would some kind person please try pinging the addresses 202.12.88.42 or
> > 202.12.88.106 and let me know the results, please?
> >
> > I need to test the ICMP block on my router from external ping traffic.
> >
> > --
> > David
> >
> > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
>
>

--

No added Sugar.  Not tested on animals.  May contain traces of Nuts.  If
irritation occurs, discontinue use.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew McNaughton           In Sydney
                            Working on a Product Recommender System
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +61 422 753 792     http://staff.scoop.co.nz/andrew/cv.doc



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to