On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 12:59, Alexander Samad wrote: > To ask a silly question why not use say DNAT instead of a smtp proxy.
I've just looked at DNAT and it will pass the packets straight through so only really useful for NAT (hence it's name) type applications i.e. no public IP or protection of other ports open on the mail server itself. I want a mail proxy that will also help ensure that valid SMTP is passed onto the mail server. -- Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
