On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 13:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The overhead I though about was more about the CPU time required > to sift through the records rather than the amount of memory it takes. Last I looked in detail, its a three-level tree lookup - pretty much constant regardless of swap size. > I haven't heard about the 2.6 improvments you talk about, so what > you are saying is that "large swap is not such a bad idea" under 2.6? Yup. -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
