On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:20:03PM +1300, Adam Bogacki wrote: > My /etc/dhcp.conf currently looks like that below; everything else > commented out. > > When I write a subnet declaration for 192.168.0.0 and for 192.168.0.1 > (server - > presumably the "network segment to which interface start is attached") I > get the > message that the two conflict. > > Any ideas ? > > Adam > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 { > > option domain-name "paradise.net.nz"; > > option broadcast-address 192.168.0.1; > > option routers 192.168.0.1; > > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.224; > > range 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2; > > default-lease-time 21600; > > max-lease-time 21600; > >} > >#subnet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.24 {
Whoa! The specification should be 'subnet <network address> netmask <mask>'. First rule: network addresses always end in even numbers. I think you need to redescribe your problem, because I'm getting a bit of a mixed messsage from the random-quoted stuff at the bottom of your message. - Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html