On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:42:59 +1000 QuantumG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After much in-fighting, the decision was made to go with > Perforce instead - which is actually pretty good. In comparison to CVS maybe. I'm using GNU Arch at home and Perforce at work using Perforce has made me *VERY* aware of just how good Arch really is. > Does > anyone know a good, preferably Australian, CVS support company? Back in the late 1990s I worked for a company that did all its development by way of tarballs emailed from developer to developer (however scary that may sound). When we moved to CVS, we had a guy come in, set it up on a Solaris box, and document how the developers were supposed to use it. We paid for about a month's worth of consulting for the setup and the developers maintained it after that. > I wonder how hard it would be to start one. Probably not too hard, but I wonder how big the market is. Most companies seem pretty proficient at maintaining revsision control systems themselves. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "C++ : You won't live long enough to learn it all from experience." -- Peter Miller (author of Aegis) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
