Thanks, Before this gets into a debate about the GPL I want to just clarify that SMEserver is distributed under the GPL
see; http://www.contribs.org/contribs/bobk/SME_Manual/chpt-01.2.html and is actually in the web interface, so if that is removed we have a problem. also this site puts it plain and simple about the gpl. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-violation.html I am not saying the companies name right now but will be tomorrow.. I just want to ring and hear him say he made the software first person as I have only heard of them saying it via third person. thanks On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 10:24 +0100, Rev Simon Rumble wrote: > On 26/7/2005, "Jeff Grima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I am doing some further investigation into this, > > > >What are the things to look for? > > > >So far I am looking for; > >The removal of copyright/copyleft text > > This is the most serious. > > >Changes to the code and selling it without providing source > > No, redistributing ANY GPL code, including code modified by them, without > making the source available (not necessarily "providing" it). -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
