1) Just received this?
Is this ham fisted jerk genuine?
It is mainly the wording of the attached full letter that is offensive.
2) err, woops sent with attachments & delayed and now I gather it may be
genuine.
Can anyone explain
1) why it was done so ham fistedly (apart from he's a lawyer - nuff
said)
2) what are the rules for the general commons use of Linux?
3) Or should I just change every occurrence of Linux to
GNU/Linux and let those two sort it out {:-).
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Use of Linux Trade Mark in Australia
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:12:56 +0800
From: Jeremy Malcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: iLaw
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Dear Sir or Madam
I act for Linus Torvalds, and I am writing to you about your use of the
trade mark "Linux". This is not a letter of demand, but rather a request
for your assistance, and an attempt to inform or remind you of the
rights and obligations associated with the use of the trade mark "Linux".
For further information please refer to the attached PDF letter.
Yours faithfully,
Jeremy Malcolm
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au www:
http://www.woa.com.au
Wombat Outdoor Adventures <Bicycles, Computers, GIS, Printing,
Publishing>
"People without trees are like fish without clean water"
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
