On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:51:52PM +0100, Ben Buxton wrote: > Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing: > > I know about BIND views, in fact I use them, but I don't think they will > > work here. > > > > What I need is for lannet.com.au, thisdomain.tld and thatdomain.tld to > > all resolve to the same public w.x.y.z externally, but be DNAT'd to > > different private 192.168.y.z addresses internally. > > You want to use something called 'pound'. I use it to do exactly what > you ask. > > http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ > > One binary, one configuration file. Piece of cake.
Looks great, but it's equivalent to my suggestion to use Apache with name virtual hosts and mod_proxy. Howard wants something for all (?) protocols, which is impossible in principle because you don't know which name they want in general -- all the server gets is the ip. Matt -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
