On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:01, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Bret Comstock Waldow">
>
> > Nothing I read in his messages gave me reason to know that this was
> > anything more official than a strongly held personal opinion, used as an
> > attack.
> >
> > As for the committee's opinion, what about the membership's?  Was this
> > voted on?  That would be legitimate - but you haven't mentioned that,
> > either, I notice.
>
> There have been long discussions about this in the past. You can see the
> list guidelines here:

And after several messages, this is the first time you've provided this 
pointer.  Perhaps it should have been the first thing?

However...

>
>   http://www.slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html#q8
>
> > It might be so, but no one is saying that, so I'll admit I'm wondering a
> > bit about the culture of this LUG now.
>
> Suggestions of positivity cause you to wonder? :-)

I've looked back over the messages, and the ones that gave me pause weren't 
yours.  My apologies.

Regards,
Bret

Attachment: pgpQOj2SwkBdK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to