On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:01, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Bret Comstock Waldow"> > > > Nothing I read in his messages gave me reason to know that this was > > anything more official than a strongly held personal opinion, used as an > > attack. > > > > As for the committee's opinion, what about the membership's? Was this > > voted on? That would be legitimate - but you haven't mentioned that, > > either, I notice. > > There have been long discussions about this in the past. You can see the > list guidelines here:
And after several messages, this is the first time you've provided this pointer. Perhaps it should have been the first thing? However... > > http://www.slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html#q8 > > > It might be so, but no one is saying that, so I'll admit I'm wondering a > > bit about the culture of this LUG now. > > Suggestions of positivity cause you to wonder? :-) I've looked back over the messages, and the ones that gave me pause weren't yours. My apologies. Regards, Bret
pgpQOj2SwkBdK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
