On Monday 03 April 2006 10:46, you wrote: > On 4/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't see why ordinary name based virtual hosts is not applicable? > > Probably cause I believe they had said they have 2 internal > webservers. Which means 2 possible server to redirect one static ip? > Dont think that would work myself. Infact we all know it wont work. > > http-accel mode of squid allows squid to forward request to correct > box for any domain request incoming from internet static ip. And it > then means no extra ports for someone to add on end to get to a > certain webserver on a internal box cause it has to serve on 81 > instead of default 80. > > http-accel works very well.
Fumbles for an excuse: I read the original briefly, then your reply. THEN thought that thats very complicated for a simple problem. Sorry! (the two internal servers, not two web pages, oooops) Cheers James -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
