On Thu, December 28, 2006 10:37 am, Penedo wrote: > On 28/12/06, Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect you are looking at this in the wrong way - try to contain the > CMS > systems (e.g. maybe run them under a limited user and chroot or some other > segregated environment) instead of trying to identify and hide all > potential tools used by holes in the CMS. perhaps, but, it certainly would have prevented two infiltration I had in the last few month I suspect any kind of segregated environment would require bigger hardware ? -- Voytek -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
