Jeremy, > This seems to contradict your previous statement. If you don't wish > this "server in question" with the sensitive information, to run DNS > services, why not set up the configuration that you already established > as probable, with the DNS hosted entirely by different servers? > > I don't understand why the current configuration of some particular > server should rule out the possibility of a different configuration > being possible? > > Perhaps I misunderstand. > Ah, I think when I added a new sentence I messed up my meaning. Sometimes an attempt at further clarification makes things a little less clear.
I did mean server A is "served" by servers B & C in the naming stakes. Thanks for the confirmation that it is possible. Regards, Rick -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
