Jeremy,

> This seems to contradict your previous statement.  If you don't wish 
> this "server in question" with the sensitive information, to run DNS 
> services, why not set up the configuration that you already established 
> as probable, with the DNS hosted entirely by different servers?
> 
> I don't understand why the current configuration of some particular 
> server should rule out the possibility of a different configuration 
> being possible?
> 
> Perhaps I misunderstand.
> 
Ah, I think when I added a new sentence I messed up my meaning.
Sometimes an attempt at further clarification makes things a little less
clear.

I did mean server A is "served" by servers B & C in the naming stakes.

Thanks for the confirmation that it is possible.

Regards,

Rick

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to