On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:15:51PM +1100, Joel Heenan wrote: > SLUG, > > We have a requirement in a new project to have a distributed > filesystem. Files are written to one of 32 * 200MB volumes and we need > to keep them in sync with a DR site. Rsync, I believe, will be just > too slow to replicate changes - unless there is some way to make the > rsync daemon hook into the kernel and know what changes have been > made?
lustre comes to mind ? you haven't really expanded on how the striping is supposed to be done ? > > RHEL GFS I think will not work across such differences and won't do it > asynchronously. can you expand on across such differences. > > unionfs is I think too experimental. > > Continous Access, using our SAN to replicate the data, at this point > has to be discounted because of licensing. > > How do other people generally solve this problem? > > Thanks > > Joel > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- "We will stand up for terror --we will stand up for freedom." - George W. Bush 10/18/2004 Marlton, NJ in a campaign speech
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
