This one time, at band camp, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ideally you want your data security right down to the individual syscall > level. > Various products like what Cisco offer let you specify what access to what > data various applications have, but i don't know how useful it is protecting > people from copy/pasting data around. I know at least the "secure" versions > of IRIX and Digital UNIX were doing useful things like tagging individual IPC > data with security ACLs, preventing you from copy/pasting between high->low > security contexts. That was fun to work inside. :)
But the nice security vendor man installed a box on our network and gave me a certificate that promised we were secure! -- Rev Simon Rumble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.rumble.net The Tourist Engineer Just because you're on holiday, doesn't mean you're not a geek. http://engineer.openguides.org/ "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." - Thomas Jefferson -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
