I'll get this right eventually... 2009/2/8 jam <j...@tigger.ws>
> On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:00:05 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: > > It's been a while since there's been a thread like this, so I thought it > > would be fun :) > > > > so, have you got any? > > > > I've got 2 to share today: > > > > alt >and then > > alt < > > > > for interactive shells, works kinda like ctrl r or !$ - that is, it > > searches your history but in a strangely useful but different way > > The petrol in this car .... meaning this message is too vague - BASH does > not > do any of this READLINE in bash does so say do: Well, yeah, readline is used by bash. But bash often seems to have it by default (there's usually a whole section for it in the manpage). > > set -o vi > and all the above is completely false, and vi stuff applies instead > I don't have any trouble using ctrl-r with (readline's) vi mode but I think atl-> is more problematic. Guess I'm getting the best of both worlds. > So 'when using bash in emacs mode you can ... bla bla' > > James > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- Daniel Bush -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
