On Thursday 29 January 2009 22:49:09 Jeremy Visser wrote:
> Any idea why syslogd is behaving as such?

I still haven't got any closer to fixing the issue, even with all the great 
suggestions from SLUGgers.

A few hours ago, I removed sysklogd and replaced it with syslog-ng, and it 
seems to be running well so far. (Crosses fingers.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to