A question about Squid ACL's (from an existing config I'm working on). Let's say the config file defines (in this order) these ACL's and rules:
acl foo src 1.2.3.4 acl bar url_regex -i .bar.com http_access allow foo http_access allow foo bar http_access deny all The second http_access line is redundant, isn't it? Or have I missed something here? Any request with a source address of 1.2.3.4 would match the first http_access rule and never get to the second rule. Quoting chapter and verse from O'Reilly: "As with the algorithm for matching the values of an ACL, when Squid finds a matching rule in an access list, the search terminates." Thanks for any clue sticks, Sonia. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
