Dear all,

Since we are on the topic of virtualisation, I'm just curious what's
everyone's take on virtualisation of hardware/servers versus not having
a single point of failure (i.e. when the main server goes down,
everything goes down with it).

I'm presently considering setting up a secondary system which
automatically kicks in if/when the primary system goes down. But this
seems counter to the argument that virtualisation is a way to
consolidate resources, no?
-- 
Regards,

Junhao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jmarki.net/

"Oops, what happened?", said Confused Jmarki

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to