(http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9044723&intsrc=hm_list)

=====
ODF backer abandons file format in favor of W3C alternative
OpenDocument Foundation claims that its namesake format isn't so open after all
Elizabeth Montalbano

October 30, 2007  (IDG News Service) -- A group that was set up to
promote the Open Document Format for Office Applications (ODF) is
abandoning its support of that file format in favor of a set of
specifications developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

The OpenDocument Foundation Inc. doesn't have any control over ODF.
But its embrace of the W3C's Compound Document Formats (CDF) adds a
new twist to the already acrimonious debate over the possible creation
of a universal file format for desktop applications.

The OpenDocument Foundation was formed five years ago to push for the
adoption of a universal format. Until recently, the group was focused
on the technology upon which it based its existence: ODF, which is
overseen by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured
Information Standards (OASIS) and has been approved as an
international standard by the Geneva-based ISO standards body.

But in a blog posting earlier this month, Sam Hiser, vice president
and director of business affairs at the OpenDocument Foundation,
outlined why the group now thinks that CDF is a more viable universal
format than ODF is. Foundation officials "have been displeased with
the direction of ODF development this year," he wrote. "We find that
ODF is not the open format with the open process we thought it was."

[...]
=====
-- 
Soh Kam Yung
my Google Reader Shared links:
(http://www.google.com/reader/shared/16851815156817689753)
my Google Reader Shared SFAS links:
(http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/16851815156817689753/label/sfas)

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to