Hi Kokhong

>I 
think 
this 
would 
require 
a 
way 
to 
perform 
remote 
synchronization 
of 
>the 
configuration 
database, 
assuming 
that 
'identical' 
systems 
are 
being 
>configured 
(except 
hostnames, 
ip 
address, 
etc).
My  concern was on  ensuring  that  identical systems run rather than assuming 
identical system
exist. Focus was on compliance engine :
Consider a case where an organisation decides to update its servers with a 
patch of a critical 
product.

  How can we ensure that none of its servers are left behind and all of the 
servers actually get the 
patches organisation wide.
How can we ensure automation in this regards? 

regards 
divyank

--- -- Original Message ----
From: Kokhong Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2008 12:22:31 AM
Subject: [Slugnet] Re: Linux System Configuration


Hi 
Wai 
Peng 
and 
Divyamk,

Thanks 
for 
the 
refreshing 
feedback!
> 
First 
of 
all, 
why 
the 
inclination 
towards 
a 
REAL 
database 
format? 
What 
are 
the 
> 
pros 
that 
a 
DB 
offers, 
over 
flat 
files? 
Speed 
might 
be 
one, 
but 
how 
big 
are 
> 
conf 
files 
going 
to 
get?
>  
 
It's 
neither 
about 
size 
nor 
speed. 
Structured 
database 
formats 
are 
very 
good 
for 
searching, 
sorting, 
inserting, 
deleting, 
etc. 
I 
think 
if 
and 
when 
we 
really 
implement 
such 
a 
system 
using 
flat 
files, 
we 
might 
have 
also 
replicated 
the 
same 
features 
to 
handle 
the 
processing 
of 
information.
> 
What 
I 
am 
worried 
most 
about, 
is 
the 
idea 
of 
storing 
all 
your 
eggs 
in 
one 
> 
basket. 
What 
happens 
if 
the 
registry 
gets 
corrupted? 
How 
good 
are 
the 
tools 
> 
to 
recover 
them? 
Putting 
all 
configurations 
together 
+ 
using 
a 
binary 
format 
> 
for 
them 
= 
bitch 
when 
you 
need 
to 
recover 
something. 
Best 
have 
a 
backup 
lying 
> 
around, 
cos 
when 
that's 
dead 
no 
daemons 
will 
be 
able 
to 
boot.
>  
 
Correct. 
Always 
have 
backups. 
This 
is 
a 
system 
design 
issue 
rather 
than 
an 
implementation 
one. 
Text 
files 
can 
get 
corrupted 
too. 
To 
borrow 
some 
concepts, 
implementing 
checksums, 
keeping 
the 
last 
known 
good 
configuration, 
creating 
system 
restore 
points, 
allowing 
admins 
to 
dump 
and 
load 
current 
configurations, 
and 
in 
the 
worst 
case, 
restoring 
from 
a 
failsafe 
default. 
The 
binary 
database 
format 
can 
also 
be 
dumped 
into 
text 
format 
and 
stored 
somewhere, 
so 
that 
manual 
recovery 
becomes 
possible.

As 
an 
example, 
I 
am 
running 
an 
automated 
daily 
backup 
of 
my 
database 
tables 
by 
dumping 
into 
text 
format 
(SQL 
statements) 
and 
committing 
to 
Subversion, 
so 
that 
I 
lose 
one 
at 
most 
one 
day's 
changes 
due 
to 
accidental 
deletion 
or 
corruption.
> 
Also, 
one 
will 
have 
to 
take 
note 
of 
what 
happens 
if 
a 
user 
wants 
to 
install 
a 
> 
program 
by 
themself? 
For 
example, 
I 
have 
specific 
builds 
of 
mplayer/mencoder 
> 
that 
is 
not 
available 
with 
rpms. 
They 
have 
their 
own 
conf 
files 
> 
under 
/home/waipeng/etc/xxx/. 
In 
this 
case, 
you 
need 
to 
put 
aside 
parts 
of 
> 
the 
registry 
for 
user.
>
>  
 
Windows 
also 
stores 
per-user 
registry 
information 
in 
each 
user's 
home 
directory. 
For 
example, 
Unix 
has 
per-user 
.bashrc/.bash_profile, 
etc 
to 
override 
system 
defaults. 
The 
configuration 
tools 
can 
abstract 
the 
complexities 
from 
the 
user 
by 
first 
looking 
for 
user-specific 
configurations 
first, 
failing 
which 
they 
will 
fetch 
the 
system 
wide 
configurations 
(this 
can 
happen 
for 
first 
time 
users 
of 
the 
application).

>  
I 
feel 
its 
would 
be 
worth 
while 
considering 
the 
idea 
of 
the 
ability 
to 
configure 
any 
single  
host
> 
over 
the 
network 
or 
set 
of 
server 
farms 
using 
the 
configurator 
tool.
> 
This 
would 
enable 
administrators 
to  
use 
it 
as 
compliance 
engine 
across 
the 
organisation.
> 
Features 
Like:
>  
  
 
Auto 
update
>  
  
 
Jump 
start 
software 
installations 
from 
known 
location
>  
 
I 
think 
this 
would 
require 
a 
way 
to 
perform 
remote 
synchronization 
of 
the 
configuration 
database, 
assuming 
that 
'identical' 
systems 
are 
being 
configured 
(except 
hostnames, 
ip 
address, 
etc). 
The 
way 
I 
am 
doing 
this 
now 
is 
to 
setup 
SSH 
auto 
login 
to 
run 
commands 
on 
remote 
systems 
from 
a 
master 
system. 
Updates 
and 
software 
installations 
can 
then 
be 
run 
non-interactively. 
I 
use 
rsync 
on 
top 
of 
SSH 
to 
synchronize 
configuration 
files 
(and 
sometimes 
even 
filesystems 
if 
I 
need 
to 
propagate 
manually 
compiled/installed 
software). 
This 
way, 
I 
do 
less 
duplicated 
work 
and 
get 
to 
keep 
my 
sanity 
at 
the 
same 
time.

Regards,
Kokhong

_______________________________________________
Slugnet 
mailing 
list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet





      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to