On 10/17/2016 10:46 AM, Andrew Elwell wrote: > > Hi folks, Hi! > > I see from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 that > there have been a few unsuccessful attempts to get slurm into fedora > (and potentially EPEL) > > Is anyone on this list actively working on it at the moment? I'll > update the bugzilla ticket to prod the last portential packager but > failing that I'm offering to work on it. > > My plan is to get 16.05 into fedora, but not into EPEL itself (the > supported life of a given release is just too short to match with the > RHEL timeline), however I'll probably put "unofficial" srpms publicly > available that shoud meet all the epel packaging requirements. > > schedmd people - as some of this may involve patches to the spec file > amongst other things, what's the best way to progress this - attach a > diff to something on your bugzilla page rather than git pull req?
Just recently i succeed to build and run successfully 16.05.5 on fedora 23 and i had to use patches from : https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443 and https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/slurm-devel/HiltSkNiGJU (well i succeeded locally as in my copr repo i still have problem with f23 and f24 but i don't know why) it would seem that these problems on fedora (with the hardened build) are known but so far no work towards solving (nor workarounds implementation) was done .. Thanks, Adrian
